Abstract

Research Article

Clinical relevance linked to echocardiography diagnosis in Bland, White and Garland syndrome

Mariela Céspedes Almira*, Adel Eladio González Morejón, Giselle Serrano Ricardo, Mariela Céspedes Almira*, Adel Eladio González Morejón, Giselle Serrano Ricardo and Tania Rosa González Rodríguez

Published: 06 March, 2020 | Volume 5 - Issue 1 | Pages: 051-055

Introduction: Bland, White and Garland syndrome is a coronary anomaly with high mortality without treatment. Its clinical presentation is varied which makes epidemiological documentation difficult. Echocardiography is a useful non-invasive tool for diagnosis.

Objective: To determine the echocardiographic variables that lead to the diagnosis of Bland, White and Garland syndrome and their clinical relevance.

Material: Observational, prospective and cross-sectional study in 31 patients of the “William Soler” Pediatric Cardiocenter, from 2005 to 2018. To check the association of echocardiographic variables with the diagnosis of Bland, White and Garland syndrome, an effectiveness study was carried out that included the analysis of the incidence of echocardiographic variables that lead to the diagnosis of this entity. The clinical relevance was estimated according to the minimum importance limit. The statistical validation of the research results adopted a significance level of less than 5% (p < 0.05).

Results: The variables that facilitate the echocardiographic diagnosis of Bland, White and Garland syndrome were the echocardiographic visualization of the anomalous connection and the reversed flow in the anomalous left coronary artery. These echocardiographic measures have clinical relevance according to the quantification of risk estimators (incidence) the echocardiographic visualization of the anomalous connection, RR 39.00 and the reversed flow in the anomalous coronary artery, RR 26.31. LIM´s calculation value amounted to 6.31 and coincided with the risk estimators (incidence).

Conclusion: The echocardiographic visualization of the anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary arterial trunk and the detection of the local intracoronary reversed flow instituted as factors to be considered for the effective diagnosis of the disease. The documentation of the diagnostic aspects of the syndrome through echocardiography contains high statistical value and clinical relevance.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.jccm.1001086 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF

Keywords:

Bland; White y Garland syndrome; Clinical relevance; Incidence

References

  1. Ramírez RF, Bitar HP, Paolinelli GP, Pérez CD, Furnaro F. Anomalías congénitas de arterias coronarias, estudio de aquellas con importancia hemodinámica. Rev Chil Radiol. 2018; 24: 142-50.
  2. López LP, Centella Hernández T, López Menéndez J, Cuerpo Caballero G, Silva Guisasola J, et al. Registro de intervenciones en pacientes con cardiopatía congénita de la Sociedad Española de Cirugía Torácica-Cardiovascular 2017 y retrospectiva de los últimos 6 años. Cirug Cardiov. 2019; 26: 28-38.
  3. Perloff JK. Anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary trunk. In the clinical recognition of congenital heart disease. 4th edition. Perloff JK, editor. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co. 1994; 546-561.
  4. Wen-xiu L, Bin G, Jiang W, et al. The echocardiografphy diagnosis of infantile and adult types of anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery. Chin J Evid Based Pediatr. 2014; 9: 186-189.
  5. Arunamata A, Buccola Stauffer KJ, Punn R, Chan FP, Maeda K, et al. Diagnosis of anomalous aortic origin of the left coronary artery in a pediatric patient. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2015; 6: 470-473. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26180168
  6. Yarrabolu TR, Ozcelik N, Quinones J, Brown MD, Balaguru D. Anomalous origin of left coronary artery from pulmonary artery-duped by 2D; saved by color Doppler: echocardiographic lesson from two cases. Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2014; 7: 230-232. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4189245/
  7. Mertens LL, Rigby ML, Horowitz ES, et al. Cross sectional echocardiographic and doppler imaging. In: Anderson RH, editor. Paediatric Cardiology. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier Ltd; 2010; 313 – 339.
  8. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015; 28: 1-39. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25559473
  9. Cordero L, Rodríguez J, Zuluaga J, Mendoza F, Pérez O. Utilidad de la ecocardiografía en la detección de la insuficiencia cardíaca en un adulto joven con síndrome de origen anómalo de la arteria coronaria izquierda del tronco de la arteria pulmonar y válvula mitral asimétrica similar al paracaídas. Rev Colomb Card. 2018; 25:151.
  10. Weigand J, Marshall CD, Bacha EA, Chen JM, Richmond ME. Repair of anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery in the modern era: preoperative predictors of immediate postoperative outcomes and long term cardiac follow‑ Pediatr Cardiol. 2015; 36: 489-497. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25301273
  11. Holst LM, Helvind M, Andersen HO. Diagnosis and prognosis of anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery. Dan Med J. 2015; 62: A5125. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26324080
  12. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it is not. BMJ. 1996; 312: 71-2. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8555924
  13. García Garmendia JL, Maroto Monserrat F. Interpretación de resultados estadísticos. Med Int. 2018; 42: 370-379.
  14. Landa Ramírez E, Martínez Basurto AE, Sánchez Sosa JJ. Medicina basada en la evidencia y su importancia en la medicina conductual. Psicología y Salud. 2013; 23: 273-282.
  15. Laporte JR. Principios básicos de investigación clínica. 2da. ed. Barcelona: Astra Zeneca; 2001.
  16. Tajer CD. Ensayos terapéuticos, significación estadística y relevancia clínica. Rev Argent Cardiol. 2010; 78: 385-390.
  17. Bonmatí AN, Vasallo JM. Estadística básica en Ciencias de la Salud. Univ Alicante. 2016:7-59.
  18. Moncho J. Estadística aplicada a las Ciencias de la Salud. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2015; 62-92.
  19. Ochoa Sangrador C. Evaluación de la importancia de los resultados de estudios clínicos. Importancia clínica frente a significación estadística. Evid Pediatr. 2010; 6: 40-50.
  20. Bilder, Christopher R. Loughin, Thomas M. Analysis of Categorical Data with R. First ed. USA: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2014; 378-382.
  21. World Medical Association (WMA). World Medical Association Inc. Declaration of Helsinki-Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [homepage en Internet]; 64ª Asamblea General, Fortaleza, Brasil, octubre 2013 [citado 16 de marzo de 2019]. Disponible en: https://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html
  22. Cañedo Andalia R. Medicina basada en la evidencia: un nuevo reto al profesional de la información en salud. ACIMED [serie en Internet]. 2001 [citado 16 de marzo de 2019; 9. Disponible en: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/aci/vol9_1_01/aci011001.htm
  23. Alva Díaz C, Aguirre Quispe W, Becerra Becerra Y, García Mostajo J, Huerta Rosario M, et al. La medicina científica y el programa medicina basada en evidencia han fracasado? Educ Med. 2018; 19: 198-202.
  24. Baptista González HA. El número necesario a tratar (NNT) y número necesario para hacer daño (NNH). Valoración de la magnitud de la relación beneficio vs. riesgo en las intervenciones médicas. Rev Invest Med Sur Mex. 2008; 15: 302-305.
  25. Silva Fuente-Alba C, Molina Villagra M. Likelihood ratio (razón de verosimilitud): definición y aplicación en Radiología. Rev Argent Radiol. 2017; 81: 204-208.
  26. Straus, Glasziou, Richardson, Haynes. Medicina basada en la evidencia: Cómo practicar y enseñar la medicina basada en la evidencia. 5e ed. España: Editorial Elsevier; 2019.
  27. Ortega Páez E. Sigue vigente hoy día la medicina basada en la evidencia? Rev Pediatr Aten Primaria. 2018; 20: 323-328.

Figures:

Figure 1

Figure 1

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More